MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1571244038

Rejected Children and Their Friends: A Shared Evaluation of Friendship Quality?

2000· article· en· W1571244038 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal) · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Canadian institutionsResearch Unit on Children's Psychosocial Maladjustment
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFriendshipPsychologyPerceptionSociometric statusSociometryConcordanceDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyQuality (philosophy)Medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past research of the link between sociometric status and friendship quality has been focused only on the focal children's perceptions. Children's perceptions, however, may differ from those of their friends. In a sample of 369 children (second to fifth grade), the concordance between children's and their friends' perceptions of various relationship features was examined as a function of children's sociometric status. Rejected children's perceptions showed considerably lower correlations with their friends' perceptions than did average and popular children's perceptions. Furthermore, rejected children's friends perceived their friendships, on average, less positively than rejected children themselves. Popular children's friends perceived their friendships, on average, more positively than popular children themselves. Average children's mean perceptions did not differ (rom those of their friends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it