MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1571250960 · doi:10.4000/ebisu.801

Le Kojiki, une Énéide longtemps oubliée ?

2013· article· fr· W1571250960 on OpenAlexaff
François Macé

Bibliographic record

VenueEbisu · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La confrontation de ces deux textes, d’apparence si différents, devrait permettre de mieux faire ressortir la place du Kojiki dans l’histoire littéraire japonaise. On l’a pris parfois pour une histoire, ce qu’il n’est pas, pour un recueil de mythes, mais cela ne concerne que le premier livre, pour un texte de commande assez maladroit, ce qui mérite discussion.En fait, il légitime comme l’Énéide, un nouveau pouvoir à l’issue d’une guerre civile en chantant les origines. Comme l’œuvre de Virgile, c’est une épopée de lettré jouant savamment des oppositions et des échos entre le Temps des dieux et celui des hommes.Transcrit de façon elliptique, il ne correspondait pas au goût des élites sinisées de l’Antiquité. Sa redécouverte tardive ne lui rendra pas entièrement son statut d’œuvre littéraire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEbisuSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207