MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1571303241 · doi:10.23919/eumc.2011.6101868

A new optically controlled CDS-polymer capacitor for tunable microwave components

2011· preprint· W1571303241 on OpenAlexaff
José Manuel González, Nicolas Delhote, Dominique Baillargeat, Nathan Jess, Langis Roy, Steven McGarry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorCapacitanceMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPermittivityDielectricMicrowavePhase shift moduleElectrodeElectrical engineeringInsertion lossComputer scienceTelecommunicationsVoltageEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the first time, we show that a new optically sensitive MIM CdS-polymer capacitor can provide sufficiently large capacitance variation to be useful for tunable microwave components. The new capacitor, based on photoconductive particle inclusions that cause dielectric permittivity change with light, is demonstrated in a coplanar circuit operating over the 1 to 10 GHz band. Upon illumination through the lower ITO electrode, its capacitance varied from 0.16pF to 0.18pF, a 13% change. A complete equivalent model of the capacitor is given. The basic CPW circuit could easily be modified to overcome present material limitations associated with the optically transparent ITO metal and the CdS polymer mix, leading to future low cost, simply processed, integrated, tunable components such as filters and phase shifters. This new technology allows for the elimination of performance degrading electronic circuitry that has traditionally plagued reconfigurable components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207