MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1571355708 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.2005.1517298

Low-order Kalman filters for channel estimation

2005· article· en· W1571355708 on OpenAlexaff
Michael McGuire, Mihai Sima

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterRayleigh fadingFadingFast Kalman filterInvariant extended Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Extended Kalman filterMinimum mean square errorFading distributionComputer scienceAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)StatisticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the design of low-order Kalman filters to estimate radio channels with Rayleigh fading. Rayleigh fading cannot be perfectly modelled with any finite order auto-regressive (AR) process. Previously, only first and second order Kalman filters were used for channel estimation since higher order Kalman filters were found to not significantly improve accuracy. This is due to mismatches in the statistics of the AR models of the Kalman filters and the true Rayleigh fading. In this paper, the coefficients of the AR models for the Kalman filter are calculated by solving for the minimum square error solutions of an over-determined linear systems. The AR models generated have statistics closely matching the Rayleigh fading process. The Kalman filter using these AR models can accurately estimate the Rayleigh fading process. The accuracy of the new Kalman filters is demonstrated in the tracking of simulated Rayleigh fading processes of different bandwidths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207