Les parures en or de la nécropole thrace de Duvanli du ve siècle av. J.-C. : le cas du tumulus de Kukova
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article présente les premiers résultats du projet de création d’une base de données relative aux caractéristiques typologiques, stylistiques et technologiques des parures de l’époque classique et hellénistique de la collection du Musée National d’Archéologie de Sofia. La discussion scientifique porte sur l’origine des bijoux en or de la tombe de Kukova, du tumulus du ve siècle av. J.-C. Ces objets constituent les éléments d’un ensemble original de bijoux de tête et de corps typiques de l’élite thrace également présents dans deux autres riches tombes de la nécropole de Duvanli. Ces parures sont exécutées dans un style qui renvoie à des prototypes grecs, macédoniens et thraces. Les caractéristiques technologiques des bijoux sont examinées au moyen d’analyses semi quantitatives des alliages d’or par la méthode de fluorescence à rayons X et des observations sous un microscope optique digital, afin de diversifier les possibilités de recherche concernant leur origine. L’étude a fourni de nouveaux arguments à la description des groupes stylistiques formés auparavant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".