Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review of the most recent studies (up to June 1986) dealing with the Sangamonian in some key areas clearly indicates that, as yet, there is no definitive answer to the question : "When did the ice which eventually became the Laurentide Ice Sheet begin to accumulate?" In most areas the stratigraphic record simply identifies a probable interglacial period; the record yields no information on when ice growth may have started following that warm climatic interval. However the deltaic glacial lake sediments of the Scarborough Formation in the Toronto area and the Bécancour Till in the Trois-Rivières area are thought to possibly date from the Sangamonian (marine isotope sub-stages 5d-b). The Adam Till in the James Bay Lowland may be correlative. In Atlantic Canada, mostly in Cape Breton Island, plant fossils suggest a mid-Sangamonian climate roughly comparable to that which prevailed 11-12 ka ago. On Baffin Island a marine transgression of mid-Sangamonian age is thought to result from important ice accumulation in the area. These stratigraphic interpretations suggest significant glacier expansion in several areas of the North American continent during part of the Sangamonian Stage. Whether or not any of this ice survived a warmer climate period near the end of the Sangamonian to become part of the Laurentide Ice Sheet is a matter of speculation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".