MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long‐lasting intracontinental strike‐slip faulting: new evidence from the Karakorum shear zone in the Himalayas

2011· article· en· W1571565806 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Hervé Leloup, Emmanuelle Boutonnet, W J Davis, Kéiko Hattori

Bibliographic record

VenueTerra Nova · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaGeological Survey of Canada
FundersCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsGeologyMagmatismZirconShear zoneStrike-slip tectonicsShear (geology)GeochemistrySeismologyFault (geology)PetrologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terra Nova, 23, 92–99, 2011 Abstract Zircon crystallization ages for a syntectonic granite and an associated dyke along the Tangtse strand of the Karakorum fault are 18.5 ± 0.2 and 18.6 ± 0.2 Ma, respectively. A dyke cross‐cutting the foliation in the Karakorum shear zone (Ksz) yielded an age of 16.0 ± 0.6 Ma. These data show that the Ksz was associated with significant granitic magmatism and was active before 16 Ma, since at least c. 18.5 Ma. Consideration of other data along the Karakorum fault suggests that the fault has most likely been active since c. 22.7–25 Ma at a rate of 8–13 mm a−1. This study conducted in the frontal part of the Himalayan orogen shows that large continental strike‐slip faults can be linked with magmatism and be stable for more than 20 Ma, even in the hottest part of the orogen where strain localization is supposed to be at a minimum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTerra NovaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207