Bibliographic record
Abstract
La massification de la consommation de tenues sportives s’explique par des transformations structurelles. En effet, la place du spectacle sportif dans les médias, la survalorisation de l’héroïsme sportif, l’emprise du marketing et diverses mutations sociales s’épaulent pour faire de la culture sportive une culture prisée des adolescents. L’usage du paraître sportif par cette population essentiellement masculine, exprime une volonté de s’approprier symboliquement la ville. Souvent exclus des logements et des activités culturelles et marchandes du centre, les groupes d’adolescents étudiés (à Strasbourg, France) utilisent le paraître sportif et son cortège de marques jugées prestigieuses pour investir l’espace citadin, mettre en scène une identité positive, afficher les signes de la virilité, constituer des réseaux et exister dans le regard des passants.Arborer exclusivement des tenues sportives pour flâner n’est pas seulement le signe d’une soumission au marketing des offreurs, c’est aussi, à travers des composantes matérielles, revendiquer une existence dans la ville.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".