RÉPRÉSENTATIONS IMAGINAIRES DES AMÉRIQUES AU BRÉSIL ET AU QUÉBEC: UN SURVOL.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O deslocamento de um grande número de estrangeiros vindos de várias partes do mundo habitar a América possibilitou a criação de diversas utopias sobre o continente. Este texto se propõe analisar isso a través do exame de duas obras de categorias distintas : Amrik, da brasileira Ana Miranda e Les lettres Chinoises, de Ying Chen, uma representante da literatura migrante no Qubec. Amrik é a palavra árabe recorrente no imaginário dos orientais do começo do século passado como a possibilidade de realização de sonhos de prosperidade em terras pacíficas; Les lettres Chinoises ilustra o cruzamento de vozes e atitudes subjetivas com relação ao espaço língua/cultura/identidade dos imigrantes chineses na América do Norte. O romance de Ying Chen é o testemunho de uma América cheia de ambiguidades, mas até certo ponto bem sucedida. Ana Miranda, por sua vez, mostra um rico registro da decepção dos europeus e orientais à procura da "terra prometida", uma promessa que não se cumpriu. Résumé: La mobilité d’un grand nombre d’étrangers venus du monde entier habiter en Amérique a entraîné la création de diverses utopies sur le continent. Nous nous proposons d’analyser cela en examinant deux œuvres de catégories distinctes : Amrik, de la Brésilienne Ana Miranda et Les lettres chinoises de Ying Chen, une représentante de la littérature migrante au Québec. Amrik est le mot arabe qui peuplait fréquemment l’imaginaire des Orientaux du début du siècle dernier, illustrant la possibilité d’accomplir des rêves de prospérité sur des terres pacifiques ; Les Lettres Chinoises montre le croisement des voix et des attitudes subjectives par rapport à l’espace langue/culture/identité des immigrants chinois en Amérique du Nord. Le roman de Ying Chen est le témoignage d’une Amérique pleine d’ambiguïtés mais "réussie". Ana Miranda, par contre, montre un registre fertile de la déception des Européens et des Orientaux à la recherche de la "terre promise", une promesse non remplie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".