CONSTRUIR PARA PRODUCIR. PEQUEÑAS ELEVACIONES EN TIERRA PARA EL CULTIVO DE MAÍZ EN EL SITIO CAÑADA DE LOS CAPONCITOS, TACUAREMBÓ (URUGUAY)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces new evidences in order to discuss the nature of production and management of plant resources and their relationship with prehistoric earthen structure’s construction and use, with an emphasis on micro-reliefs. Currently documented earthen structures in Tacuarembo county, in Uruguay (n=996) were placed in lowland floodplains, at the edge of wetlands and over ranges and hills, forming, in some cases, groupings between 15 and 60 mounds. With respect to the internal arrangement of archaeological sites, settlements could be described through their earthen structures (micro-reliefs, platforms, mounds and ramps) and also by other anthropogenically transformed traits (lagoons, channels and depressed areas). The hypothesis to test is that small earthen structures at Canada de los Caponcitos (micro-reliefs) were constructed and used as cultivation plots. Archaeological and archaeobotanical results identified the anthropogenic origin of such structures and evidenced a richer and more diverse set of opal phytoliths than the outer control area. Economically important plants, such as Arecaceae, Cannaceae, and corn phytoliths appear after 885 14C yrs BP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".