MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1572116347

Futures of Democracy

2014· article· en· W1572116347 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Howard A. Doughty

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinnovation journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParliamentHonourDemocracyPoliticsLawCivil libertiesSociologyPolitical scienceEconomic historyMedia studiesHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Futures of Democracy Mika Mannermaa, Jim Dator and Paula Tiihonen, Eds. Democracy and Futures Helsinki: Parliament of Finland, 2006Mika MannermaaDemocracy and the Turmoil of the FutureHelsinki: Parliament of Finland, 2007Osmo Kuusim, Hanna Smith and Paula Tiihonen, Eds.Russia 2017: Three ScenariosHelsinki: Parliament of Finland, 2007Farrington Hall is no more. It was built in 1930 to honour Wallace Rider Farrington, the sixth territorial governor of Hawai'i-and a staunch Republican. Just off the original quad, it provided the University of Hawai'i with its first theatrical venue. It was, however, already decrepit and moldy when I first met Jim Dator. He was coming out of his office one fine summer day in 1970. We were introduced and exchanged pleasantries. That was shortly before Farrington Hall was demolished.In its place, the University has built a modern high-rise and hermetically sealed tower to house its social science faculty. It has a palm tree in its central arboretum. It has air conditioning, wifi and vending machines that take credit cards. The new building is called Saunders Hall. It was named in honour of Allan Saunders, who taught political science at the University and who helped start the Hawai'i chapters of the League of Women Voters, the American Civil Liberties Union and the American Association of the United Nations. He also led the movement to allow male professors to wear aloha shirts on campus. Times change.It was in Saunders Hall that I most recently saw Jim Dator, one fine winter day, in 2007. He has lasted longer than Farrington Hall. The future has caught up with him. Me too.Saunders Hall is said to be environmentally sustainable. Personally, I liked the old building much better. Not feeling the tropical breeze through an open window just seems wrong. In any case, Farrington Hall was and Saunders Hall is about as far away from Finland as it's possible to be. The books under review were all produced by the Parliament of Finland. Small world.In 1970, Jim Dator won some local renown by addressing a committee of the state legislature. I was tremendously impressed. So were the committee members-almost enough to take his advice seriously and engage in public sector innovation. Dator suggested a number of new ways to do things. He tried to convince the legislators of the reality and the urgency of environmental issues. He advocated a systematic and not a merely analytic approach to problems. He told them to think scientifically and experimentally. He undermined their penchant for law making and asked them to understand the wisdom of law discovering. He may have upset them a little when he suggested that they not punish, but instead reward non-violent social deviants and nonconformists. In any case, they listened attentively. They could have acted; but, they didn't. Almost no one has.Fast-forward forty-odd years and three books appeared on my desk unannounced, unsolicited, about 6,600 kilometres from Helsinki and also about 7,500 kilometers from Saunders Hall. They were handsome volumes made with excellent paper. They were well-designed, featured fine graphics and displayed a photo of a splendid bronze statue of a mother and child on the front of each one. The sculpture was named Future. Jim Dator's name was on the cover of one of the books.I had never thought much about Finland until relatively recently; when it began to dawn on me that it might be the most successful country in the world. By almost every measure of social well-being-education, health care, life expectancy, civil liberties, economic equity, prosperity and so on-Finland always seems to rank in the top ten and usually in first, second or third place. Its only consistent rivals appear to be Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands and sometimes Switzerland. I don't speak Finnish and I detest the cold. So, I haven't begged the country to let me in. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.014
Scholarly communication0.0120.014
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinnovation journalSame topicSocial Media and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207