Intelligence and International Security: New Perspectives and Agendas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Introduction: Journeys in Twilight Len Scott, R. Gerald Hughes and Martin S. Alexander 2. The Future of Intelligence: Seeking Perfection in an Imperfect World? Len Scott and R. Gerald Hughes 3. Global Intelligence Co-operation versus Accountability: New Facets to an Old Problem Richard J. Aldrich 4. 'The Internationalismof Islam': The British Perception of a Muslim Menace, 1840-1951 John Ferris 5. Security Intelligence and Human Rights: Illuminating the 'Heart of Darkness'? Peter Gill 6. Rise, Fall and Regeneration: From CIA to EU Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones 7. Intelligence Cooperation Meets International Studies Theory: Explaining Canadian Operations in Castro's Cuba Don Munton 8. From Saigon to Baghdad: The Vietnam Syndrome, the Iraq War and American Foreign Policy Andrew Priest
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it