Bibliographic record
Abstract
backgroundAlthough, it is widely believed that this lesion was described for the first time in 1978 by two independent research groups led by Cohen (1978), andBhasin (1978) in patients presenting with heavy proteinuria, the deposits of predominant IgM in the glomeruli, in fact, were first described in renal biopsies in 1974 by Putte et al. (1974) in patients presenting with persistent or recurrent hematuria.Soon after the formal recognition of the disease as a distinct entity in 1978, many series were reported on the disease mostly from USA, UK, other countries of Europe, and South East Asia (Al-Eisa et al., 1996;Cavalo & Johnson, 1981; www.intechopen.com How to referenceIn order to correctly reference this scholarly work, feel free to copy and paste the following: Javed I. Kazi and Muhammed Mubarak (2012).Update on IgM Nephropathy, Topics in Renal Biopsy and Pathology, Dr. Muhammed Mubarak (Ed.),
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".