MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1572450274 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2005.1555966

Algorithms of fast SVM evaluation based on subspace projection

2006· article· en· W1572450274 on OpenAlexaff
Jianxiong Dong, Ching Y. Suen, Adam Krzyżak

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005. · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMNIST databaseSupport vector machineKernel (algebra)Subspace topologyComputer scienceBinary numberPattern recognition (psychology)Projection (relational algebra)Block (permutation group theory)AlgorithmClass (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsDeep learningCombinatoricsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fast iteration algorithm is proposed to approximate the reduced set vectors shared by each binary SVM solution for multi-class classification simultaneously. The iteration algorithm can be applied to the general kernel types such as k(/spl par/ x - x' /spl par//sup 2/) and k(x/sup T/x'). In addition, we present a fast block algorithm in the test phase to speed up the classification further. Experimental results have shown that the classification speeds on MNIST and Hanwang handwritten digit databases on P4 1.7 Ghz were about 16,000 and 10,895 patterns per second without sacrificing the classification accuracy of the original SVM system. The speed-up factor of 110 on MNIST database has been achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005.Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207