Active site residues and mechanism of UDP‐glucose dehydrogenase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UDP-glucose dehydrogenase catalyzes the NAD+-dependent twofold oxidation of UDP-glucose to give UDP-glucuronic acid. A sequestered aldehyde intermediate is produced in the first oxidation step and a covalently bound thioester is produced in the second oxidation step. This work demonstrates that the Streptococcus pyogenes enzyme incorporates a single solvent-derived oxygen atom during catalysis and probably does not generate an imine intermediate. The reaction of UDP-[6",6"-di-2H]-d-glucose is not accompanied by a primary kinetic isotope effect, indicating that hydride transfer is not rate determining in this reaction. Studies with a mutant of the key active site nucleophile, Cys260Ala, show that it is capable of both reducing the aldehyde intermediate, and oxidizing the hydrated form of the aldehyde intermediate but is incapable of oxidizing UDP-glucose to UDP-glucuronic acid. In the latter case, a ternary Cys260Ala/aldehyde intermediate/NADH complex is presumably formed, but it does not proceed to product as both release and hydration of the bound aldehyde occur slowly. A washout experiment demonstrates that the NADH in this ternary complex is not exchangeable with external NADH, indicating that dissociation only occurs after the addition of a nucleophile to the aldehyde carbonyl. Studies on Thr118Ala show that the value of kcat is reduced 160-fold by this mutation, and that the reaction of UDP-D-[6",6"-di-2H]-glucose is now accompanied by a primary kinetic isotope effect. This indicates that the barriers for the hydride transfer steps have been selectively increased and supports a mechanism in which an ordered water molecule (H-bonded to Thr118) serves as the catalytic base in these steps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".