Le modèle québécois : un horizon théorique pour la recherche, une porte d’entrée pour un projet de société ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il existe un modèle québécois de développement en émergence de type partenarial. Ce modèle est différent aussi bien du modèle keynésien et fordiste de la révolution tranquille que du néolibéralisme. Par contre, ce modèle ne possède pas encore de bases solides, car insuffisamment institutionnalisées. Les traits possibles de cette nouvelle configuration ont été identifiés par les travaux du CRISES à propos des innovations sociales des deux dernières décennies initiées. Ces innovations proviennent des acteurs sociaux organisés que soit au sein des entreprises manufacturières, de certains services marchands et de l’économie sociale De plus, contrairement à ce que certains pensent, il y a une autre façon de penser le renouvellement du modèle de développement. Un mode basé sur la solidarité qui donne plus de place au partenariat et à la société civile serait le fondement de ce renouvellement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".