MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1572567778 · doi:10.14288/bcs.v0i172.2059

McBride of McKenna-McBride: Premier Richard McBride and the Indian Question in British Columbia

2011· article· en· W1572567778 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patricia E. Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionLawHistorySociologyGenealogyEthnologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To those who study the history of the First Nations in British Columbia, the Royal Commission on Indian Affairs in British Columbia, popularly known as the McKenna-McBride Commission, a joint federal-provincial project, is a familiar document.McKenna as a commissioner is well known but who was McBride?Richard McBride, a native British Columbian though not of aboriginal ancestry, was the Conservative premier of British Columbia, 1903-1915.As the winner of four consecutive provincial elections, he understood popular opinion in the province so an examination of his views on the “Indians” provides background for the Commission. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0560.017
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207