Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia in children: beware of overtreatment!
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the various musculoskeletal manifestations of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia in children, and the course of this disease in childhood. METHODS: Ten children were diagnosed and treated at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) for multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, 1976-2001. We reviewed the clinical, pathological and radiographic records for these cases to determine cause of presentation and progress of the musculoskeletal pathology during the course of this disease in this age group. RESULTS: Average age at time of first presentation was 6 years and 4 months (range 2 wk to 13 yr). Mean follow-up was 6 years and 2 months (range 1-144 mo). Only 2 children required surgery. Two children were diagnosed at birth; 2 were referred as cases of bilateral Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. Two children presented with asymmetrical genu valgum; 1 with knee pain, genu valgum, loose bodies, and early degenerative joint disease of both knees; and 2 with limp. CONCLUSION: Although multiple epiphyseal dysplasia is a disease of childhood, it is seldom severe enough to require operative intervention in the initial 2 decades of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".