BRASILEIROS NO CANADÁ: EM BUSCA DE SEGURANÇA?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estudos apontam a migração internacional como resultado da insegurança econômica no país de origem. Este texto apresenta uma pesquisa realizada em Toronto, com um grupo de imigrantes brasileiros, cujo objetivo era entender a relação entre a migração internacional e a insegurança no Brasil. O resultado aponta para o fator econômico, que pode ser visto como um tópico da insegurança, ao lado da insegurança política, ambiental, social e física, que tem contribuído para a migração de brasileiros. Essas dimensões, intrínsecas e resultantes das relações sociais, podem ser melhoradas através do “uso da força”, bem como através da “educação”, se queremos construir a segurança humana no Brasil.Abstract: Studies point to international migration as a result of economic insecurity in the country of origin. This paper presents a research conducted in Toronto, with a group of Brazilian immigrants, intending to understand the relationship between the international migration and insecurity in Brazil. The results demonstrate that the economic factor can be seen as a topic of insecurity, besides the political, environmental, social and physical constrains, that have contributed to the migration of Brazilians. These intrinsic dimensions and resulting from social relations can be improved through “hard security” as well as through “education” if we want to build human security in Brazil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it