MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1572896110 · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/324

Cathodoluminescence of Sr<sub>2</sub>B<sub>5</sub>O<sub>9</sub>Cl thin films doped with Tm<sup>3+</sup>, Tb<sup>3+</sup>and Mn<sup>2+</sup>

2002· article· en· W1572896110 on OpenAlexafffund
Jianhua Hao, Michael Cocivera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCathodoluminescencePhosphorChromaticityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Thin filmMaterials scienceDopingMineralogyOpticsOptoelectronicsChemistryLuminescenceNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin-film phosphors of Sr 2 B 5 O 9 Cl doped separately with Tm 3+ , Tb 3+ and Mn 2+ were deposited by spray pyrolysis of aqueous solutions. Because these phosphor films were activated at 600 °C, they are suitable for use on glass substrates. The films containing Tm 3+ , Tb 3+ and Mn 2+ exhibited blue, green and yellow cathodoluminescence (CL), respectively. The chromaticity coordinates, dominant wavelength and purity were determined for each phosphor. Films deposited on aluminosilicate ceramic plates exhibited enhanced CL intensity compared to those on glass plates. The CL luminance and efficiency of each phosphor depended on the electron beam voltage and current density. Saturation effects were observed as the current density increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207