MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1573144041 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1993.332276

Multi-level bang-bang control of DC motors using a PLC

2002· article· en· W1573144041 on OpenAlexaff
J. A. Khoury, Liuchen Chang, A.Μ. Sharaf

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Automation and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgrammable logic controllerReliability (semiconductor)DC motorControl engineeringBang–bang controlProcess (computing)Variable (mathematics)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceMachine controlElectronic speed controlInduction motorController (irrigation)Control systemEngineeringControl (management)Optimal controlElectrical engineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Programmable logic controllers (PLC) have been widely used in industrial process control, due to their low cost, high reliability and integrated logic functions. This paper reports the development of the multi-level bang-bang control (MLBB) scheme, a simple and robust non-linear control algorithm for PLC implemented closed-loop control system. The developed MLBB algorithms have been tested and verified using a DC motor variable speed drive controlled by a PLC. Test results have shown that under MLBB regulation, the DC motor drive is capable of maintaining the desired speed under both speed demand changes and load variations.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndustrial Automation and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207