MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1573193885 · doi:10.1109/tdei.2003.1176573

Breakdown voltages of polymers in the temperature range 23°-250°C

2003· article· en· W1573193885 on OpenAlexaff
G. R. Govinda Raju, A. Katebian, S.Z. Jafri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectric strengthMaterials scienceWeibull distributionDielectricComposite materialPolymerPolyimidePolyamideVoltagePolyesterBreakdown voltagePolymer chemistryElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsLayer (electronics)MathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The direct voltage electric strengths of several polymers are measured using a new type of environmental chamber in which a new specimen of the material can be introduced without the necessity of cooling and reheating after every voltage application. The range of temperatures at which investigations are carried out is 23/spl deg/C-250/spl deg/C. The plots of the dielectric strength on Weibull paper demonstrates departure from the two parameter Weibull distribution, particularly at low field strengths. In each case the method of determining the more favorable distributions are discussed with the view of obtaining consistent results for the dielectric strength. The lower voltage breakdown cannot be ignored if high reliability is desired and the evaluated dielectric strengths on this basis are also presented. The polymers studied are aromatic polyamide, PTFE, aromatic polyimide and polyamide-polyester-polyamide composites. Thickness effects are presented for selected polymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical InsulationSame topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207