MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1573216565 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.1992.301319

Performance of the CDF DAQ system in the 1992 run

2003· article· en· W1573216565 on OpenAlexaff
K. Biery, K. Ragan, R. Grindley, A. Hölscher, P. Sinervo, R. M. Harris, K. Schurecht, T. Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVerilogData acquisitionEvent (particle physics)Computer scienceOperating systemComputer hardwareReal-time computingEmbedded systemField-programmable gate arrayPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CDF data acquisition system was upgraded for the 1992 run, with modifications to the front-end electronics and the addition of a second FASTBUS-based event builder. The goal is a 35-Hz output rate to the Level 3 trigger processor farm. The initial performance of the system up to the Level 3 input is reviewed and compared to that of a Verilog simulation. The system runs reliably and its performance is in good agreement with the predictions of the behavioral simulation.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical ImagingSame topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207