MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1573660244 · doi:10.4000/revdh.1308

Entretien avec François Alabrune, Directeur des affaires juridiques du Ministère des Affaires étrangères

2015· article· fr· W1573660244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicolas Hervieu

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des droits de l’homme · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis mai 2014, François Alabrune est le directeur des affaires juridiques du ministère des affaires étrangères et du développement international. La direction ainsi placée sous son autorité exerce notamment une double mission : d’une part, conseiller le ministre, son administration et les services diplomatiques sur les questions juridiques ; d’autre part, représenter la France devant les instances internationales à caractère arbitral ou juridictionnel, notamment la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme et la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne. De juillet 2009 à mai 2014, François Alabrune fut ambassadeur, représentant permanent de la France auprès de l’Organisation pour la sécurité et la coopération en Europe (OSCE). Auparavant, il occupa différentes fonctions : à la direction des affaires juridiques, à la représentation permanente de la France auprès de l’Union européenne à Bruxelles, à la mission permanente auprès des Nations Unie à New York et en tant que Consul général de France à Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des droits de l’hommeSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207