MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1573707069 · doi:10.1002/9781118856024.ch2

Primary Flow Transitions in the Baroclinic Annulus

2014· other· en· W1573707069 on OpenAlex
Gregory Lewis, Nicolas Périnet, Lennaert van Veen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical monograph · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaroclinityPrandtl numberPhysicsAnnulus (botany)InstabilityFlow (mathematics)Nonlinear systemMechanicsClassical mechanicsParameter spaceStatistical physicsMathematicsGeometryConvectionMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter discusses the effects that the Prandtl number has on the dynamics near the primary flow transition, i.e., the transition from the steady axisymmetric solution to rotating waves. It uses a dynamical systems approach that uses linear stability analysis, center manifold reduction, and normal forms to determine the behavior of the model equations near the primary transition. The chapter then describes the model equations and the methods involved in computing the primary transition curve, i.e., the curve in the parameter space that indicates where baroclinic instability sets in. It presents an example of a regime diagram for an experiment that uses water as the working fluid. Next, the chapter presents the nonlinear analysis and results for a wide range of Prandtl number. It concludes with a discussion of how the analysis can be extended to study the flow far from the transition, particularly, in the wave and vacillation regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it