A clinico-microbiological and in-vitro sensitivity study of canine Malassezia pachydermatitis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eight dogs were presented with dermatological disorders and screened for presence of Malassezia pachydermatitis on the basis of clinical signs, microscopic and cultural examination. The highest percentage of dogs with Malassezia pachydermatitis were seen in age group of two to eight years with German shepherds as the most frequently affected breed followed by Labrador retrievers. The most common clinical signs recorded were moderate to intense pruritus in dogs (100%), erythematous lesions at ventral neck, axilla region in 4 dogs (50%), seborrhea in 3 dogs (37.5%), alopecia in 6 dogs (75%), musty odor in 2 dogs (25%), hyper pigmentation of skin and ears in 3 dogs (37.5%), 2 dogs (25%) respectively and lichenification resembling elephant like skin in one dog (12.5%). Microscopic examination of new methylene blue stained smears revealed dark blue colored, foot print shaped or peanut shaped Malassezia pachydermatitis organisms. In vitro anti fungal sensitivity against Malassezia pachydermatitis revealed, highest sensitivity towards Ketoconazole (100%) followed by Clotrimazole (25%), Nystatin (12.5%) and resistant to Amphotericin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".