Bibliographic record
Abstract
La politique, chez Arendt, est à la fois le lieu d’un lien et d’un écart. Elle est ce qui réunit les hommes lorsqu’ils nouent entre eux des rapports normés, tout en les maintenant éloignés, en préservant la pluralité qui nourrit les relations humaines : si l’acosmisme est ce qui caractérise les peuples privés de toute confrontation à l’altérité, alors la politique doit permettre d’instaurer un espace commun qui ne soit pas négateur des différences. Mais les exemples de l’Antiquité grecque et romaine ne permettent pas de vérifier la possibilité d’un tel lieu paradoxal. Au contraire, la politique comme monde commun semble toujours contenir une part de répression de l’altérité qui trouve son expression ultime dans le totalitarisme. Entre anomie et uniformité, l’espace de la politique est instable et fragile. De même, peut-être, que la démocratie, seul régime susceptible de s’installer durablement dans cet espace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".