MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1573841833 · doi:10.4000/leportique.729

L’Espace de la démocratie.

2005· article· fr· W1573841833 on OpenAlexaff
Erwan Sommerer

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Portique · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Canadian institutionsEspace pour la vie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La politique, chez Arendt, est à la fois le lieu d’un lien et d’un écart. Elle est ce qui réunit les hommes lorsqu’ils nouent entre eux des rapports normés, tout en les maintenant éloignés, en préservant la pluralité qui nourrit les relations humaines : si l’acosmisme est ce qui caractérise les peuples privés de toute confronta­tion à l’altérité, alors la politique doit permettre d’ins­taurer un espace commun qui ne soit pas négateur des différences. Mais les exemples de l’Antiquité grecque et romaine ne permettent pas de vérifier la pos­sibilité d’un tel lieu paradoxal. Au con­traire, la poli­tique comme monde commun semble toujours con­tenir une part de répression de l’altérité qui trouve son ex­pres­sion ultime dans le tota­litarisme. Entre anomie et uni­formité, l’espace de la politique est ins­table et fragile. De même, peut-être, que la démocratie, seul ré­gime susceptible de s’installer durablement dans cet espace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe PortiqueSame topicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political TheoryFrench-language works237,207