MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W157386734 · doi:10.1177/159101991001600108

Balloon Kyphoplasty for Acute Osteoporotic Compression Fractures

2010· article· en· W157386734 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tao Yang, S. Liu, Xianli Lv, Zhongxue Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCompression (physics)BalloonRadiologyOsteoporotic fractureOsteoporosisSurgeryInternal medicineBone mineralComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We reviewed the effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of acute symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. We assessed radiographic and functional outcome in 11 patients with a 24.3 month follow-up from a retrospectively monitored series of 11 patients who underwent balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). A visual analogue scale (VAS) and the short McGill questionnaire (MPQ) were used to assess average symptoms. Eleven patients with 19 treated vertebrae completed the study. The VAS showed significant improvement after treatment: the initial score was 9.1+/-0.6 (mean+/-SD), falling to 2.7+/-1.07 by 24.3 months (P<0.001). The MPQ also showed a significant improvement (P<0.001) at follow-up. A new fracture was seen in one patient affecting two vertebrae adjacent to the treated level. On CT following the procedure, there was cement leakage in the disc in 9% of cases. BKP is a minimally invasive procedure that has been shown to be effective in the treatment of acute symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. It appears that BKP is associated with a low incidence of procedure-related complications and cement extravasation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional NeuroradiologySame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207