MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1573928766 · doi:10.1159/000096319

Activation of Kinases upon Volume Changes: Role in Cellular Homeostasis

2006· review· en· W1573928766 on OpenAlexaff
R. Todd Alexander, Sergio Grinstein

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to nephrology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPolyamine Metabolism and Applications
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarcinosarcomaHistogenesisPathologyAdenocarcinomaMedicineImmunohistochemistryBasal cellCarcinomaBiopsySquamous carcinomaCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cell is constantly encountering stimuli or conditions that can induce alterations to cell volume. Despite these challenges, cell volume remains relatively constant, by virtue of a series of complex and often redundant regulatory mechanisms. Acutely, an efflux of ions and organic osmolytes counteracts the tendency of cells to swell. Conversely when cells are exposed to perturbations that cause shrinkage, ions are rapidly imported. Chronic hypertonic stimulation increases the transcription of multiple genes whose products promote the intracellular accumulation of organic osmolytes. How the cell perceives these acute alterations in volume in order to signal the activation of specific channels, transporters and transcription factors has been the focus of a large body of research. In this article, we describe the central role that kinases play in mediating the cellular responses to alterations in cell volume. Although incompletely understood, these fundamental processes are key to cellular homeostasis and have obvious clinical implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to nephrologySame topicPolyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207