MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1573993079 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2005.1556144

Detection ofactuator faults using a dynamic neural network for the attitude control subsystem of a satellite

2006· article· en· W1573993079 on OpenAlexafffund
Iz Al-Dein Al-Zyoud, K. Khorasani

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005. · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceResidualFault detection and isolationFault (geology)Activation functionAttitude controlNonlinear systemMultilayer perceptronObserver (physics)PerceptronActuatorControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringAlgorithmControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this paper is to develop a neural network-based residual generator for fault detection (FD) in the attitude control subsystem (ACS) of a satellite. Towards this end, a dynamic multilayer perceptron (DMLP) network with dynamic neurons is considered. The neuron model consists of a second order linear IIR filter and a nonlinear activation function with adjustable parameters. Based on a given set of input-output data pairs collected from the attitude control subsystem, the network parameters are adjusted to minimize a performance index specified by the output estimation error. The proposed dynamic neural network structure is applied for detecting faults in a reaction wheel (RW) that is often used as an actuator in the ACS of a satellite. The performance and capabilities of the proposed dynamic neural network is investigated and compared to a model-based observer residual generator design that is to detect various fault scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005.Same topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207