MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1574014484

Buitenbeentjes en boegbeelden; advies over megabedrijven in de Nederlandse land- en tuinbouw

2006· article· nl· W1574014484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H.J. Silvis, G Borger, J.T.G.M. Koolen, M.D.A.M. van der Laan-Veraart, G.W. van Montfrans-Hartman, F. C. Prillevitz, P. Levelink, C. van Bruchem, Thomas Hermans, H.B. van den Kerkhof, Dirk Strijker

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-Environmental Systems Modeling · 2006
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Het rapport wordt afgesloten met bedrijfsrapportages. 1. Wilhelminadorp (Zuid-Beveland, 1700 ha groot. Naast akkerbouw ook zaaizaad, en 162 ha mosselpercelen in Oosterschelde). 2. Breukers (In Slowakije een bedrijf van 700 ha). 3. Teboza (Helden, aspergeteelt)100 ha asperges, 180 ha tevens in Tsjechië). 4. Van de Bilt Zaden en Vlas (vestiging in Sluiskil; teelt van vlas in Flevopolders en Zeeuws-Vlaanderen; tevens een bedrijf in Frankrijk van 3000 ha). 5. Van den Oever Boomkwekerijen (Haaren, 130 ha laanbomen, heesters). 6. Seasun (Kapelle, 50 ha kastuinbouw paprika's en tomaten). 7. Vrebamelkvee (Vredepeel, 1000 melkkoeien, 675 jongvee). 8. Koepon (Aduarderzijl, 175 ha, met twee bedrijven in voormalig Oost-Duitsland, 1 in Schotland en 1 in canada, en startend in Polen; tevens in bezit van makelaardij AgriPon) 9. Den Eelder (Well, 450 koeien met eigen productie en afzet van zuivel). 10. Buist (Noordlaren, grootste natuurboer van Nederland en tevens grootstye biologische vleeshouder; 1200 ha en ruim 600 stuks Limousin). 11 Varkenshouderij in Noord-Limburg (eigen bedrijf met 200 zeugen en op 14 locaties gepachte stallen, tevens vestiging in Oost-Duitsland met 7000 zeugen en 2500 ha akkerbouw)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocio-Environmental Systems ModelingSame topicEnvironmental Conservation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207