MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1574023512 · doi:10.1300/j087v46n01_03

Mothers' Discussions with Daughters Following Divorce

2006· article· en· W1574023512 on OpenAlex
Marei Bindi. Luedemann, Marion F. Ehrenberg, Michael A. Hunter

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Divorce & Remarriage · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDaughterDevelopmental psychologyQuality (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study investigates how postdivorce maternal discussions with early adolescent daughters are related to mother-daughter relationships quality in the long-term. Employing individual interviews and self-report questionnaires, this was retrospectively assessed from the perspectives of 97 older adolescent and young adult daughters who experienced their parents' divorce during childhood. Participants reported on how frequently their mothers talked about a broad range of topics, and on variables assessing the emotional climate surrounding the discussions. Analyses revealed that the frequency of discussions was differentially linked to mother-daughter relationship quality, depending on the topic. The emotional climate of the talks predicted relationship quality, over and above the frequency for the most discussed topic areas. Results highlight the importance of including contextual variables in understanding the impact of post-divorce discussions on adolescents, and in guiding practitioners helping divorcing families achieve healthy outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it