MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1574179872 · doi:10.22122/jrrs.v9i3.766

The comparison of the lumbopelvic stabilizer muscle endurance in female athletes with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome

2013· article· en· W1574179872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohamadi Elham, Reza Rajabi

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIsometric exercisePhysical therapyTrunkAthletesPatellofemoral pain syndromeAbdominal musclesAsymptomaticStraight leg raiseSurgeryRange of motion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Decreased hip muscles strength has been implicated to lower-extremity malalignment and patellofemoral pain. Proximal muscle groups including the lumbopelvic stabilizer muscles are responsible for postural control and body stability. Strengthening in these keys muscles have not been investigated in previous studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the lumbopelvic stabilizer muscles endurance in female athletes with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Materials and Methods: Thirty female athletes diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome (mean ± SD age; 21.60 ± 2.75 year, mean ± SD weight; 60.70 ± 8.70 kg, mean ± SD height; 165 ± 0.073 cm) and thirty asymptomatic females athletes (mean ± SD age; 20.77 ± 2.63 year, mean ± SD weight; 60.53 ± 6.66 kg, mean ± SD height; 164 ± 0.063 cm) with history of 3 years participating in volleyball, basketball or handball training were recruited in this study. The protocol established by McGill was used to determine the muscle endurance of the lumbopelvic stabilizer muscles. The protocol consists of four tests that measure all aspects of the torso via isometric muscle endurance: trunk flexor test, trunk extensor test (Biering Sorensen test), left and right lateral musculature tests (Side bridge test). Data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test in SPSS software. The significance level set at P < 0.05. Results: The results showed a statistically significant difference between two groups for lumbopelvic stabilizer muscles endurance (P = 0.001). The greatest differences were found in anterior part of the lumbopelvic muscle endurance (abdominal muscles). The results indicated that young women with patellofemoral pain are less likely to demonstrate endurance in lumbopelvic stabilizer muscles than age-matched control group women who are not symptomatic. Conclusion: The lumbopelvic stabilizer muscles endurance training would be proposed for prevention and treatment of patellofemoral pain. Keywords: Patellofemoral pain syndrome, Female athletes, Lumbopelvic stability, Endurance muscles

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207