MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Hypoxia reduces the function and expression of hERG potassium channels (887.2)

2014· article· en· W1574185417 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shawn M. Lamothe, WonJu Song, Shetuan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordshERGPotassium channelHypoxia (environmental)ChemistryPharmacologyInternal medicineSudden cardiac deathRepolarizationCell biologyEndocrinologyElectrophysiologyBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human ether‐a‐go‐go‐related gene (hERG) encodes the pore‐forming subunit of the I Kr channel which is important for cardiac repolarization. Loss of function of the hERG channel due to mutations or drugs causes long QT syndrome, a cardiac disorder with high risk of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death. Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) patients who experience intermittent hypoxia display an increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. We recently found that OSA patients display a trend of reduced hERG expression in atrial tissues. In the present study, we demonstrate that hypoxic culture (0.5% O 2 ) of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes for 24 h reduced I Kr by 80%. However, the same treatment did not affect the amplitudes of Na + current, Ca 2+ current, the transient outward K + current (I to ) and the inward rectifier K + current (I K1 ). Hypoxic culture (0.5% O 2 ) decreased the abundance of hERG channels expressed in HEK 293 cells along with an enhanced expression of HIF1‐ (Hypoxia‐Inducible Factor) which is known to up‐regulate various proteins including proteolytic enzymes. Chemically inducing HIF1‐ by using cobalt chloride also decreased hERG expression. Protease inhibitors including leupeptin (100µM) completely abolished the hypoxic‐induced reduction in hERG expression. Our data raised the possibility that hypoxia decreases hERG expression by activating certain proteases, which degrade the channel protein. Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research ‐ CIHR Grant Funding Source : supported by: CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→