MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Antitumor activity of sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (1013.20)

2014· article· en· W1574236815 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Yang, Binbing Ling, Ahlam Sultan, Déborah Michel, Huihua Zhang, Baohua Ma, Jason Maley, Ramaswami Sammynaiken, Jane Alcorn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSphingosineSphingosine kinaseCeramideSphingomyelinSphingosine-1-phosphateSecond messenger systemSphingolipidLipid signalingSphingosine kinase 1Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptorCell biologyReceptorChemistryBiochemistryBiologyApoptosisMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) is an endogenous metabolite derived from ceramide as part of the sphingomyelin cycle. It is a potent molecular messenger which exerts its function both intracellularly and extracellularly. Intracellularly, S1P acts as a second messenger regulating calcium mobilization, and cellular proliferation and survival. Extracellularly, S1P acts as a ligand of the G‐protein‐coupled S1P receptors (S1PRs) and mediates a variety of physiological and pathological processes. Levels of S1P and other sphingosine metabolites are maintained in a delicate balance through the action of two enzymes, sphingosine kinase (SK) and sphingosine‐1‐phosphate lyase (SPL). Our previous studies showed that exogenously administered S1P (concentration: 1 µM) exhibited synergistic effects with chemotherapy drugs in human breast cancer MCF7 and MDA‐MB‐361 cells [1, 2]. Herein, we report other cell lines and mouse xenograf study results on the antitumor activity of S1P.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingFrench-language works237,207