L'Olot del 1900. La visita de Rowland Thirlmere a la Garrotxa i les seves Letters from Catalonia and ather parts of Spain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
), apareix una referencia a unllibre de viatges que referia l’arribada d’un intel·lectual (poeta) angles des deGirona a Olot. En principi res d’important, ja que es tractava d’una simple nota apeu de pagina que anava acompanyada d’altres obres descriptives de la«provincia» de Girona de principis del segle XX.La curiositat ens va portar a cercar mes informacio sobre l’autor viatger isobre l’obra. De fet es un llibre rar (o molt rar), del qual hi ha a Catalunya un parelld’exemplars consultables (a la Biblioteca de Catalunya i a l’Institut Cartografic) ino gaire mes arreu (hem localitzat no mes d’una desena d’originals, repartits perla Gran Bretanya, Australia, el Canada i els Estats Units, en l’edicio anglesa del1904. Existeixen alguns altres exemplars mes de l’edicio americana, la del 1905).L’edicio, deixant de banda el contingut de les tres cartes que podreu llegir(traduccio que ha respectat, sempre que ha estat possible, les formes verbals i elsgirs originals, que no sempre coincideixen amb els nostres), es molt interessant:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".