Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour but de présenter les linéaments de la question laïque au Japon, où le terme « laïcité » lui-même n’est guère utilisé dans la vie quotidienne. Pour cela, les problématiques de la séparation de l’État et de la religion ( seikyô bunri ) et du vivre-ensemble multiculturel ( tabunka kyôsei ) seront pensées conjointement. D’abord, nous exposons les éléments de la laïcité consacrés par la Constitution de 1946, et situons ce régime laïque dans l’histoire du Japon. Ensuite, l’étude de quelques cas de figure qui paraissent aller à l’encontre du principe laïque de séparation nous conduit à réfléchir à la nouvelle configuration du politique et du religieux. Ainsi, on observe aujourd’hui une tendance à reconnaître le rôle public des religions, au risque de les exposer à une instrumentalisation politique. Enfin, nous analysons la manière dont s’organisent divers groupes ethnoculturels et religieux du point de vue de la laïcité de reconnaissance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".