MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1574584045 · doi:10.1002/jnm.1918

Exact stability conditions in upwinding‐scheme FDTD for the Boltzman transport equation

2013· article· en· W1574584045 on OpenAlex
Nima Chamanara, Christophe Caloz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and Fields · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpwind schemeStability (learning theory)MathematicsBoltzmann equationConstant (computer programming)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisRelaxation (psychology)Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy conditionConvection–diffusion equationVariable (mathematics)PhysicsComputer scienceDiscretizationThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY An in‐depth stability analysis of the FDTD method under the upwinding scheme for the Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) under the relaxation time approximation is provided. Both time forward and time backward difference equations are considered. In the time forward differencing case, a sufficient stability condition is derived for the BTE with variable coefficients, and a necessary and sufficient condition is derived for the BTE with constant coefficients. In the time backward differencing case, it is shown that the differencing equations are unconditionally stable. It is shown numerically that the previously reported stability conditions in the literature are not accurate. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it