Le travail de Madeleine Berkhemer, Jemima Stehli et Andrea Fraser
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les auteures proposent une analyse comparative de trois oeuvres de trois artistes femmes qui poussent à la limite le projet d’auto-objectivation sexuelle comme oeuvre d’art. Il sera d’abord question d’une photographie de Madeleine Berkhemer, Molly in Blue (2000), où l’artiste se présente harnachée de pièces de bas de nylon dans une pose classique de pin-up. Ensuite, le projet Strip Series (1999-2000) de Jemima Stehli sera à l’étude. Dans ce projet artistique, qui relève à la fois de la photographie et de la performance, l’artiste se déshabille devant différents hommes qui occupent un poste de pouvoir dans le monde de l’art. Enfin, les auteures se pencheront sur Untitled (2003) d’Andrea Fraser, où l’artiste a, en guise d’oeuvre, une relation sexuelle tarifée et filmée avec un collectionneur. Paradoxalement, en endossant de manière extrême le statut d’objet sexuel/objet d’art, ces trois femmes revendiquent aussi une subjectivité sexuelle et créative hautement subversive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".