France et Québec devant la diversité culturelle. Les politiques à l’épreuve de la surdité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur les constructions identitaires des personnes sourdes en France et au Québec, cadres politiques de traditions différentes dans la gestion des différences culturelles. Les personnes sourdes ont développé historiquement des espaces permettant l’apparition d’une vie collective, le partage de manières de dire et de penser leur rapport au monde, ainsi qu’une transmission linguistique et culturelle. La mise en place d’une politique d’intégration scolaire dans les années 1970 en France et au Québec a bouleversé ces repères traditionnels. Les sourds ont alors voulu affirmer publiquement leur existence culturelle spécifique, revendiquant le droit de s’exprimer en langues des signes. Ils souhaitent, au nom d’une meilleure participation sociale individuelle, que leur existence collective soit reconnue. Les réponses institutionnelles des gouvernements français et québécois à ces nouvelles revendications sont analysées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".