Beyond public speech and symbols: explorations in the rhetoric of politicians and the media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface Introduction by Ofer Feldman The Rhetoric of Public Personalities New Labour, New Rhetoric? An Analysis of the Rhetoric of Tony Blair by Peter Bull Domain-Related Variation in Integrative Complexity: Clinton, Gingrich, Gorbachev, and Various Canadian Political Leaders: A Measure of Political Importance and Responsiveness? by Peter Suedfeld Political Language and the Search for an Honorable Peace: Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, Their Advisors, and Vietnam Decision Making by Moya Ann Ball The Eyesore of the Beholder: Beauty as Political Discourse in the 1998 Venezuelan Presidential Elections by Maritza Montero Speech Structures in Deliberative Bodies Linguistic Strategy of Involvement: An Emergence of New Political Speech in Japan by Shoji Azuma A Psycholinguistic Analysis of The European Union's Political Discourse Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (1980-1995) by Christ'l De Landtsheer and Lise van Oortmerssen National versus Global Public Discourse in the Era of Multi-Channelism: The Introduction of Commercial and Cable Television in Israel as an Empirical Test of Habermas' Theory by Mira Moshe and Sam Lehman-Wilzig Mythical Thinking, Aristotelian Logic, and Metaphors in the Parliament of Ukraine by Sergiy Taran Speech Aimed at Encouraging Citizen Participation Raising the Social Status of Intellectuals and Prescribing Ideal Behavior for Chinese Citizens: Press Images of Model Intellectuals Under Economic Reform by Mei Zhang Non-Oratorical Discourse and Political Humor in Japan: Editorial Cartoons, Satire, and Attitudes Toward Authority by Ofer Feldman Using the Internet in Political Campaigns: Campaign Evidence from Interactive Interviews with Novice Users by Montague Kern, Marion Just, Ann Crigler, and Iris Hong Xie Visions of a Tragedy: Symbolic Covergence in the Print Media Coverage of the Murrah Building Bombing in Oklahoma City by Tracey L. Mitchell Symbolism and Social Movements: How U.S. Political Debates Are Shaped and Citizens' Attitudes Influenced by Symbolic Communiques by Nadya Terkildsen, Frauke Schnell, and Karen Callaghan Conclusion Public Speech, Symbols, and Democratic Citizenship East West by Christ'l De Landtsheer Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".