MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1575223782 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v22i1.1000

Discovering adult education at McGill University and the University of British Columbia

2009· article· en· W1575223782 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Scott MacLean

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdult educationSociologyMedia studiesHigher educationColumbia universityLibrary sciencePedagogyPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the early 1920s, McGill University and the University of British Columbia (UBC) were engaged in a traditional form of university extension: the deliveryof evening lectures by university faculty members to people not enrolled as undergraduate or graduate students. By 1935, each university had discovered the broader terrain of adult education and declared itself to be a provider of a range of educational programs and services for working adults. At McGill, adult education was established as an institutional priority in 1928 and largely disappeared by the early 1940s. At UBC, adult education was discovered in 1935 and was sustained as a prominent institutional priority until the 1960s. This article narrates the discovery and establishment of adult education at two of Canada’s most prestigious universities, and explores what this narrative means for ourunderstanding of the role of universities in Canadian adult education. Résumé Tôt dans les années 1920s, McGill University et l’University of British Columbias’engageaient dans une forme traditionnelle de l’extension universitaire : les conférences de soir données par les membres de faculté aux gens qui ne furent pas inscrits comme étudiants réguliers. Avant 1935, chaque université a découvert le terrain plus divers de l’éducation des adultes, et s’est déclaré fournisseur d’une gamme des programmes et services éducatives pour les adultes. À McGill, l’éducation des adultes a été établie comme priorité institutionnelle en 1928, mais cette priorité a plus ou moins disparu à partir des années 1940s. À UBC, l’éducation des adultes a été découvert en 1935, et a été soutenue comme priorité institutionnelle jusqu’aux années 1960s. Cette article raconte la découverte et l’établissement de l’éducation des adultes à deux des plus prestigieux universités Canadiens, et explore ce que cet narratif veut dire pour notre compréhension durôle des universités dans l’éducation des adultes au Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0360.019
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult EducationSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207