MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two new species of sympatric Fergusonina Malloch flies (Diptera: Fergusoninidae) from bud galls on high-elevation snow gums (Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng. complex) in the Australian Alps

2011· article· en· W1575463386 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Leigh A. Nelson, Sonja J. Scheffer, David K. Yeates

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Entomology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationMcMaster University
KeywordsBiologySympatric speciationSympatryBotanyEucalyptusLarvaZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two Fergusonina (Diptera: Fergusoninidae) flies are described from terminal leaf bud galls on high-elevation snow gums (Eucalyptus pauciflora complex) in the Australian Alps. The new species, Fergusonina daviesae Nelson and Yeates sp. nov. and Fergusonina taylori Nelson and Yeates sp. nov., occur in sympatry at the six collection locations. After extensive field studies, these are the only two Fergusonina species that have been found on high-elevation snow gums. The two can be distinguished from each other by differences in adult size and markings on the mesonotum. The mature larvae, which are superficially similar to each other, but differ in shape and details of the dorsal shield ornamentation, are described. Additionally, a cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequence divergence of 12.55% between the two putative species supports the conclusions drawn from the morphological study. The two species can be distinguished from other described species of Fergusonina by host specificity, adult colour, setation and larval dorsal shield morphology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of EntomologySame topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207