MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1575495683 · doi:10.1109/ptc.2015.7232508

Day-ahead dispatch of distribution feeders considering temporal uncertainties of PEVs

2015· article· en· W1575495683 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nafeesa Mehboob, Claudio A. Cañizares, Catherine Rosenberg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodCapacitorTransformerComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringElectric vehicleMathematical optimizationPlug-inSimulationControl theory (sociology)EngineeringPower (physics)VoltageMathematicsElectrical engineeringStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an approach to dispatch taps of Load Tap Changing (LTC) transformers, switched capacitors and Plug-in Electric Vehicle (PEV) charging in distribution feeders to minimize feeder daily peak demand, using a nonparametric Bootstrap technique, an alternative to Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS), to account for the PEV charging temporal uncertainties. From an initial sample of independent observations generated using a deterministic Genetic Algorithm (GA)-based optimization framework, Bootstrap samples are generated, which yield an estimate of the mean daily system peak demand, and the hourly tap, capacitor and PEV charging schedules. The proposed technique is applied to a distribution feeder model of an actual primary feeder in Ontario, considering a significant PEV charging penetration level. The results for an actual distribution feeder show the feasibility of the proposed approach, with a significant reduction of computational burden with respect to an MCS approach while still using a global search technique, which yields adequate tap and capacitor daily schedules for a Local Distribution Company (LDC) that properly accounts for PEV charging uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207