Ethical aspects of emissions trading : contribution to the World Council of Churches Consultation on "Equity and emission trading - ethical and theological dimensions", Saskatoon, Canada, May 9-14, 2000
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wuppertal Papers" do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Wuppertal Institute.They are provided to a limited number of experts so that they can learn about the ongoing work at a relatively early stage.Even though the content has normally been discussed within the Wuppertal Institute prior to being issued in the form of a "Wuppertal Paper", the authors consider their work still to be of a certain preliminary nature.For this reason, all recipients of "Wuppertal Papers" are very much invited to comment and enrich the work presented here.Slight deviations between the printed version and the PDF version are possible.For example, blank pages have been omitted in this PDF document.Therefore, if you are quoting from the PDF version, we suggest that you indicate this in brackets: (PDF version).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.026 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".