MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1575671611

Competitiveness of the Chilean Economy in the Period of Its Liberalization

2002· article· en· W1575671611 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Urszula Żuławska

Bibliographic record

VenueCentral European Economic Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberalizationDiversification (marketing strategy)EconomicsCurrencyModernization theoryExternal sectorEconomic liberalizationInternational economicsQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomyInternational tradeMarket economyBusinessMonetary economicsEconomic growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liberalization of the Chilean economy from a quarter of a century ago was intended to promote modernization of the economy and mobilization of new stimulators of the economic growth. The economy was to be financed with proceeds from the exports and inflow of foreign capital. The above strategy could succeed if the economic reforms had led to an increase in the competitiveness of the Chilean economy. In the paper, the liberalization process, the transformation of the Chilean exports and its sources, the impact of exchange rate changes on the exports' competitiveness, as well as changes in the Chilean export sector following the Asian crisis, were presented. The analysis confirmed that, in fact, the development of the export sector during the last quarter of a century largely contributed to the Chile's economic success. However, the considerable opening to the world market, with the exports structure showing a great dependence on low processingdegree goods, makes the country's economy extremely vulnerable to external shocks. If the export sector is to remain the most important source of the growth trends, a further increase in its competitiveness will be indispensable, and that will be difficult to achieve without a considerable diversification of the exports. Also, prevention of an excessive currency appreciation is of great importance for the maintenance of an exportdriven growth model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCentral European Economic JournalSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207