For a New Kind of History: A Reconnaissance of 100 Years of Canadian Socialism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The turn of the millennium also marks the centenary of Canadian socialism, dated from 1901 (the first free-standing country-wide organization) or 1905 (the formation of the first electorally successful socialist party). By probing the logic and rhetoric of key texts from the Canadian socialist movement, we can discern four distinct formations — evolutionary science, revolutionary praxis, national state management, and revolutionary humanism and national liberation — in a history marked throughout by a hegemonic liberal order. These strategies are worth careful, sympathetic, and critical study as socialist movements regroup in the 21st century. Resume Le nouveau millenaire marque aussi le centenaire du socialisme canadien, date de 1901 (le premier organisme national independant) ou 1905 (la formation du premier parti socialiste qui a reussi au scrutin). En explorant la logique et la rhetorique des textes principaux du mouvement socialiste canadien, nous pouvons faire la distinction entre quatre formations differentes — la science evolutionnaire, la praxis revolutionnaire, la gestion de l'Etat, et l'humanisme revolutionnaire et la liberation nationale — dans une histoire marquee partout par un ordre liberal hegemonique. Ces strategies meritent d'etre etudiees de facon soigneuse, sympathique et critique a mesure que les mouvements socialistes se regroupent au cours du vingt et unieme siecle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".