MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Note about the presence of the lumpsucker Cyclopterus lumpus (Teleostei, Cyclopteridae) in Galician waters (NW Spain)

2008· article· en· W1575811470 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rafael Bañón, A. Garazo, Á. Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Ichthyology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFisheryPelagic zoneArcticOceanographyBiologyGeographyEcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lumpsucker Cyclopterus lumpus Linnaeus, 1758 (Osteichthyes: Cyclopteridae) is a pelagic and solitary species distributed on both North Atlantic Ocean coasts: in the western Atlantic northward from Cape Cod (Massachusetts, USA) to Newfoundland (Canada) and in the eastern Atlantic from the south of Portugal (Vasconcelos et al., 2004) to Greenland as well as to Spitsbergen (Norway) (Holst, 1993) and the Nova Zemlya islands (Russia) in the Arctic Ocean, in addition to an unusual record in the Mediterranean (Dulcic and Golani, 2006).C. lumpus is the target of a substantial number of fisheries in several North Atlantic countries that market the roe as lumpfish caviar.The spawning behaviour and curious parental care of this species is well-known.Lumpfish migrate from the open ocean toward shallow coastal waters during the spawning season.Females lay eggs that adhere to rocks in the seaweed beds.After spawning the females leave the area, while the males look after the eggs until they are hatched (Daborn and Gregory, 1983;Davenport, 1985).Because the geographical distribution of the lumpsucker is preferably colder waters, their abundance and biology in southern Europe are poorly known.Their presence in Galician waters was documented in 1988 (Solo´rzano et al., 1988), but they were also known prior to this time.The Museum Luis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Ichthyology→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→