MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1575814651 · doi:10.1109/wisnet.2015.7127411

A new compact V-band six-port receiver for high data-rate wireless applications

2015· article· en· W1575814651 on OpenAlexaff
C. Hannachi, Serioja Ovidiu Tatu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPort (circuit theory)Electronic engineeringAmplifierElectrical engineeringRF front endLow-noise amplifierQuadrature amplitude modulationFrequency bandMicrowaveComputer scienceAntenna (radio)EngineeringCMOSBit error rateTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new V-band six-port receiver front-end fabricated on Miniature Hybrid Microwave Integrated Circuit (MHMIC) technology. Beside the antenna array, the receiver front-end includes a low noise amplifier (LNA), a six-port interferometer, and four RF power detectors. The performance of the novel six-port circuit is tested using on-wafer S-parameter measurements. The measurements clearly prove excellent amplitude and phase balance over the frequency band, while preserving good isolation and return losses at all ports. A six-port circuit computer model is implemented using all required two-port S-parameter measurements. The simulation results using this model validate the circuit performances as a quadrature down-converter. Therefore, the proposed six-port is an excellent candidate for V-band high data-rate communications, using either PSK or QAM modulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207