Medio ambiente y comercio: El caso de Mercosur y los principios de Winnipeg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El propósito del presente trabajo es identificar aquellas iniciativas promisorias que puedan fortalecer la protección del ambiente y la promoción del desarrollo sostenible en el proceso de integración regional, usando de los principios de Winnipeg como marco de referencia. Para tal fin se realizaron una serie de trabajos tendientes a evaluar y analizar la presencia de cada uno estos principios en el Mercosur, así como otros temas específicos que surgen en un marco comparativo más amplio con la Unión Europea (UE), el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) y otras experiencias de integración en las Américas. Estos trabajos fueron presentados y analizados en un taller realizado en Buenos Aires en abril de 1999. El presente documento sintetiza tanto el trabajo investigativo llevado a cabo por varios consultores, como las discusiones que tuvieron lugar durante el taller.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".